🔐 Private Research Portal

Epstein Research Portal

Access the full investigative corpus, ranked smoking guns, OCR-linked imagery, and intel briefs.

Front-of-house site Sign In / Sign Up
Same BENED DNA · Investigative Skin
← Back to Entities

📁 Al Rajhi Bank Dossier

6 documents connected to this entity

Page 1 of 1 (6 items)
#1 Strength: 4.0/10
Document preview

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023371

This document primarily discusses the legal proceedings related to the September 11th attacks and the accountability of various financial institutions and individuals that allegedly supported al-Qaeda. While it does not directly implicate Jeffrey Epstein or his activities, it highlights the broader context of financial complicity and the legal frameworks that could be relevant in investigating Epstein's own financial dealings and connections.

🔑 Key Evidence:
  • Plaintiffs-Appellants are family members of the nearly 3,000 people killed in the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.
  • Plaintiffs brought these lawsuits... to hold accountable the charities, financial institutions, individuals and other parties that knowingly provided material support or resources to al-Qaeda.
  • The district court dismissed plaintiffs’ claims against five defendants-appellees... holding that... plaintiffs were entitled to seek no relief against those who had supported, conspired with, and/or aided and abetted al-Qaeda.
👥 Connected Entities:
Al Rajhi Banking & Investment Corp. Saudi American Bank Saleh Abdullah Kamel
From: Bates: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023371
No comments yet.
#2 Strength: 4.0/10
Document preview

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023374

This document primarily discusses legal rulings related to sovereign immunity and personal jurisdiction concerning claims against the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and its princes in the context of the September 11 attacks. While it does not directly implicate Jeffrey Epstein or his activities, it highlights the complexities of legal accountability for powerful individuals and states, which could be relevant in understanding the broader context of Epstein's connections to influential figures.

🔑 Key Evidence:
  • Judge Casey held that the FSIA protected the Princes from claims arising from actions undertaken in their official capacities.
  • The Panel held that tort claims against foreign states for injuries resulting from a terrorist attack on U.S. soil may not be brought under the FSIA’s non-commercial torts exception.
  • Because Saudi Arabia is not a designated State Sponsor of Terrorism, the Panel deemed the Kingdom and SHC immune from the September 11th plaintiffs’ tort claims.
👥 Connected Entities:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Saudi Princes Al Rajhi Bank
From: Bates: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023374
No comments yet.
#3 Strength: 4.0/10
Document preview

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023385

This document discusses the Anti-Terrorism Act and its implications for individuals and organizations allegedly providing material support to al-Qaeda, which may indirectly relate to the financial operations and connections of Jeffrey Epstein. While it does not directly implicate Epstein or his associates, it highlights the potential for financial misconduct and complicity in broader networks of illicit activity.

🔑 Key Evidence:
  • Plaintiffs allege that defendants knowingly provided just such material support to al-Qaeda.
  • The district court erroneously dismissed plaintiffs’ ATA claims against Al Rajhi Bank, Saudi American Bank, and others.
  • Congress intended the ATA to be construed broadly and to provide a cause of action based on conduct that includes the support provided to al-Qaeda.
👥 Connected Entities:
Al Rajhi Bank Saudi American Bank Dar Al-Maal-Al-Islami Trust
From: Bates: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023385
No comments yet.
#4 Strength: 4.0/10
Document preview

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023388

This document primarily discusses legal arguments related to the Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA) and does not directly implicate Jeffrey Epstein or his activities. However, it highlights the potential for financial operations linked to terrorism, which could connect to Epstein's extensive financial dealings and the broader implications of his network.

🔑 Key Evidence:
  • Congress’s intent that the ATA reach just the conduct that plaintiffs allege.
  • Congress did this by 'attach[ing] liability to all donations to foreign terrorist organizations regardless of the giver’s intent.'
  • Plaintiffs abundantly provided defendants with notice of the basis for plaintiffs’ claims, including their assertion that defendants sought to advance al-Qaeda’s activities.
👥 Connected Entities:
Al Rajhi Bank al-Qaeda Congress
From: Bates: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023388
No comments yet.
#5 Strength: 4.0/10
Document preview

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023392

This document discusses the failure of financial institutions to recognize their involvement in supporting terrorist organizations, specifically al-Qaeda. While it does not directly implicate Jeffrey Epstein or his network, it highlights systemic issues in financial oversight that could relate to Epstein's own financial dealings and connections with powerful individuals.

🔑 Key Evidence:
  • The district court’s failure to infer that Al Rajhi Bank knew or had reason to know that it was providing financial services to al-Qaeda.
  • Plaintiffs alleged that United States government officials warned Al Rajhi Bank in 1999 that their financial systems were being manipulated to fund terrorist organizations.
  • The complaints allege that charities have played a singularly important role in al-Qaeda’s development and pursuit of its perverse ambitions.
👥 Connected Entities:
Al Rajhi Bank Dubai Islamic Bank United States government officials (William Weschler, Richard Newcomb)
From: Bates: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023392
No comments yet.
#6 Strength: 5.0/10
Document preview

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023396

This document does not directly implicate Jeffrey Epstein or his network in criminal activities but highlights connections between financial entities and known terrorist organizations. The mention of individuals and banks associated with al-Qaeda raises questions about the financial dealings of prominent figures, which could indirectly relate to Epstein's connections with influential individuals and their potential complicity in illicit activities.

🔑 Key Evidence:
  • Dallah al Baraka is a shareholder of Aqsa Islamic Bank, a bank that Israel has refused to approve, ‘citing obvious ties with known terrorists.’
  • Saleh Abdullah Kamel and Al Rajhi Bank’s chairman are alleged to have been identified in the 'Golden Chain' document as one of al-Qaeda’s principal financiers.
  • The Treasury Department has used inclusion on that list as a basis for designating individuals as terrorist sponsors and for freezing their assets under Executive Order 13224.
👥 Connected Entities:
Saleh Abdullah Kamel Suleiman Abdel Aziz al Rajhi Al Rajhi Bank
From: Bates: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023396
No comments yet.