🔐 Private Research Portal

Epstein Research Portal

Access the full investigative corpus, ranked smoking guns, OCR-linked imagery, and intel briefs.

Front-of-house site Sign In / Sign Up
Same BENED DNA · Investigative Skin
← Back to Entities

📁 Brad Edwards Dossier

631 documents connected to this entity

Page 8 of 32 (631 items)
#141
Document preview

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012706

📝 This document is connected to Brad Edwards but awaits AI analysis to determine its significance.

From: Bates: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012706
No comments yet.
#142
Document preview

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012707

📝 This document is connected to Brad Edwards but awaits AI analysis to determine its significance.

From: Bates: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012707
No comments yet.
#143
Document preview

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012708

📝 This document is connected to Brad Edwards but awaits AI analysis to determine its significance.

From: Bates: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012708
No comments yet.
#144
Document preview

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012709

📝 This document is connected to Brad Edwards but awaits AI analysis to determine its significance.

From: Bates: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012709
No comments yet.
#145
Document preview

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012710

📝 This document is connected to Brad Edwards but awaits AI analysis to determine its significance.

From: Bates: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012710
No comments yet.
#146
Document preview

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013283

📝 This document is connected to Brad Edwards but awaits AI analysis to determine its significance.

From: Bates: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013283
No comments yet.
#147
Document preview

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013304

📝 This document is connected to Brad Edwards but awaits AI analysis to determine its significance.

From: Bates: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013304
No comments yet.
#148
Document preview

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013305

📝 This document is connected to Brad Edwards but awaits AI analysis to determine its significance.

From: Bates: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013305
No comments yet.
#149
Document preview

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013306

📝 This document is connected to Brad Edwards but awaits AI analysis to determine its significance.

From: Bates: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013306
No comments yet.
#150
Document preview

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013307

📝 This document is connected to Brad Edwards but awaits AI analysis to determine its significance.

From: Bates: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013307
No comments yet.
#151 Strength: 5.0/10
Document preview

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013308

This document provides insight into the legal maneuvers surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's settlements with victims, particularly highlighting the confidentiality of the settlements and the context of a Ponzi scheme involving Rothstein. While it does not directly implicate Epstein in new criminal activity, it underscores the complexities of his legal battles and the potential for misconduct in how he managed his settlements and interactions with victims.

🔑 Key Evidence:
  • Epstein ultimately paid to settle all three of the cases Edwards had filed against him.
  • At Epstein’s request, the terms of the settlement were kept confidential.
  • Epstein chose to make this payment as a result of a Federal Court ordered mediation process which he himself sought.
👥 Connected Entities:
Jeffrey Epstein Edwards Rothstein
From: Bates: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013308
No comments yet.
#152 Strength: 6.0/10
Document preview

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013309

This document is significant as it highlights the legal battle between Brad Edwards and Jeffrey Epstein, particularly regarding the discovery of information from high-profile individuals. It underscores Epstein's refusal to testify and the implications of his Fifth Amendment privilege, which raises questions about his accountability and the potential concealment of evidence related to serious allegations.

🔑 Key Evidence:
  • Edwards had a sound legal basis for believing that Donald Trump, Allen Dershowitz, Bill Clinton, Tommy Mattola, David Copperfield and Governor Bill Richardson had relevant and discoverable information.
  • Epstein’s assertion of impropriety in the pursuit of this discovery clearly evidences his bad faith attempts to attribute wrongdoing to Edwards.
  • Epstein's depositions were replete with refusals to testify based upon his Fifth Amendment privilege, indicating a potential avoidance of accountability.
👥 Connected Entities:
Donald Trump Allen Dershowitz Bill Clinton
From: Bates: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013309
No comments yet.
#153
Document preview

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013310

📝 This document is connected to Brad Edwards but awaits AI analysis to determine its significance.

From: Bates: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013310
No comments yet.
#154
Document preview

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013311

📝 This document is connected to Brad Edwards but awaits AI analysis to determine its significance.

From: Bates: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013311
No comments yet.
#155
Document preview

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013312

📝 This document is connected to Brad Edwards but awaits AI analysis to determine its significance.

From: Bates: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013312
No comments yet.
#156
Document preview

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013313

📝 This document is connected to Brad Edwards but awaits AI analysis to determine its significance.

From: Bates: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013313
No comments yet.
#157
Document preview

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013314

📝 This document is connected to Brad Edwards but awaits AI analysis to determine its significance.

From: Bates: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013314
No comments yet.
#158
Document preview

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013315

📝 This document is connected to Brad Edwards but awaits AI analysis to determine its significance.

From: Bates: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013315
No comments yet.
#159 Strength: 6.0/10
Document preview

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013316

This document highlights the legal arguments surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's attempts to invoke the Fifth Amendment in a civil lawsuit, which raises questions about his accountability and the validity of his claims. It underscores the legal principle that one cannot seek affirmative relief while simultaneously refusing to provide discovery, suggesting potential evasive tactics by Epstein in the face of serious allegations.

🔑 Key Evidence:
  • Epstein could not seek damages from Edwards while at the same time asserting a Fifth Amendment privilege to block relevant discovery.
  • A plaintiff is not entitled to both his silence and his lawsuit.
  • A civil litigant’s fifth amendment right to avoid self-incrimination may be used as a shield but not a sword.
👥 Connected Entities:
Bradley Edwards Jeffrey Epstein Boys & Girls Clubs of Marion County, Inc.
From: Bates: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013316
No comments yet.
#160
Document preview

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013317

📝 This document is connected to Brad Edwards but awaits AI analysis to determine its significance.

From: Bates: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013317
No comments yet.